Comparison of Hibernate with H2 embedded vs EclipseLink with MySQL server

Each of the following tables focuses on a specific database operation, where the last table presents average results comparison.

Speed comparison of JPA database persistence operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	Hibernate H2 embedded	EclipseLink MySQL server	Hibernate H2 embedded	EclipseLink MySQL server	Hibernate H2 embedded	EclipseLink MySQL server
Basic Person Test	18.1	3.6	9.0	1.5	13.5	2.6
Element Collection Test	13.0	1.5	6.8	0.69	9.9	1.1
Inheritance Test	21.0	3.5	9.4	1.4	15.2	2.4
Indexing Test	29.9	5.3	18.4	2.5	24.1	3.9
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	17.2	1.7	20.1	1.3	18.7	1.5
Multithreading Test	36.9	7.2	11.5	2.4	24.2	4.8
All Tests	22.6	3.8	12.5	1.6	17.6	2.7

The results above show that in general Hibernate with H2 embedded is much more efficient than EclipseLink with MySQL server in persisting JPA entity objects to the database. Comparing the normalized speed of EclipseLink with MySQL database server (2.7) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 embedded database (17.6) reveals that in these tests, Hibernate with H2 embedded is 6.5 times faster than EclipseLink with MySQL server.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using graphs of objects with large transaction size. Comparing the normalized speed of EclipseLink with MySQL database server (1.3) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 embedded database (20.1) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with H2 embedded is 15.5 times faster than EclipseLink with MySQL server.

Speed comparison of JPA database retrieval operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Retrieval Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	Hibernate H2 embedded	EclipseLink MySQL server	Hibernate H2 embedded	EclipseLink MySQL server	Hibernate H2 embedded	EclipseLink MySQL server
Basic Person Test	16.6	0.43	13.3	15.5	15.0	8.0
Element Collection Test	4.3	0.16	4.0	1.4	4.1	0.78
Inheritance Test	10.4	0.39	17.5	17.6	13.9	9.0
Indexing Test	10.8	0.43	15.2	16.6	13.0	8.5
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	2.5	0.53	4.0	0.76	3.3	0.65
Multithreading Test	16.2	0.19	15.7	11.0	15.9	5.6
All Tests	10.1	0.35	11.6	10.5	10.9	5.4

The results above show that in general Hibernate with H2 embedded is more efficient than EclipseLink with MySQL server in retrieving JPA entity objects from the database. Comparing the normalized speed of EclipseLink with MySQL database server (5.4) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 embedded database (10.9) reveals that in these tests, Hibernate with H2 embedded is 2.0 times faster than EclipseLink with MySQL server.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using multithreading with small retrieval size. Comparing the normalized speed of EclipseLink with MySQL database server (0.19) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 embedded database (16.2) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with H2 embedded is 85.3 times faster than EclipseLink with MySQL server.

Speed comparison of JPA database query operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Retrieval Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	Hibernate H2 embedded	EclipseLink MySQL server	Hibernate H2 embedded	EclipseLink MySQL server	Hibernate H2 embedded	EclipseLink MySQL server
Basic Person Test	4.5	1.5	1.2	0.44	2.8	0.95
Element Collection Test	4.4	1.4	1.4	0.43	2.9	0.92
Inheritance Test	3.1	1.1	1.5	0.61	2.3	0.86
Indexing Test	6.6	0.26	10.5	0.52	8.6	0.39
Multithreading Test	1.2	1.9	0.59	0.72	0.89	1.3
All Tests	4.0	1.2	3.0	0.54	3.5	0.88

The results above show that in general Hibernate with H2 embedded is much more efficient than EclipseLink with MySQL server in executing the tested JPA queries. Comparing the normalized speed of EclipseLink with MySQL database server (0.88) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 embedded database (3.5) reveals that in these tests, Hibernate with H2 embedded is 4.0 times faster than EclipseLink with MySQL server.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using database indexes with small retrieval size. Comparing the normalized speed of EclipseLink with MySQL database server (0.26) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 embedded database (6.6) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with H2 embedded is 25.4 times faster than EclipseLink with MySQL server.

Speed comparison of JPA database update operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	Hibernate H2 embedded	EclipseLink MySQL server	Hibernate H2 embedded	EclipseLink MySQL server	Hibernate H2 embedded	EclipseLink MySQL server
Basic Person Test	12.1	0.39	6.5	1.8	9.3	1.1
Element Collection Test	7.4	0.23	5.3	1.4	6.3	0.83
Inheritance Test	10.8	0.42	8.5	2.6	9.6	1.5
Indexing Test	10.0	0.46	7.5	3.1	8.8	1.8
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	4.4	0.67	2.3	0.41	3.4	0.54
Multithreading Test	16.2	0.48	4.0	2.6	10.1	1.5
All Tests	10.1	0.44	5.7	2.0	7.9	1.2

The results above show that in general Hibernate with H2 embedded is much more efficient than EclipseLink with MySQL server in updating JPA entity objects in the database. Comparing the normalized speed of EclipseLink with MySQL database server (1.2) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 embedded database (7.9) reveals that in these tests, Hibernate with H2 embedded is 6.6 times faster than EclipseLink with MySQL server.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using multithreading with small transaction size. Comparing the normalized speed of EclipseLink with MySQL database server (0.48) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 embedded database (16.2) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with H2 embedded is 33.8 times faster than EclipseLink with MySQL server.

Speed comparison of JPA database removal operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	Hibernate H2 embedded	EclipseLink MySQL server	Hibernate H2 embedded	EclipseLink MySQL server	Hibernate H2 embedded	EclipseLink MySQL server
Basic Person Test	19.7	0.35	11.4	1.7	15.5	1.0
Element Collection Test	6.9	0.11	4.5	0.51	5.7	0.31
Inheritance Test	15.6	0.29	12.9	1.6	14.2	0.94
Indexing Test	23.2	0.46	12.4	1.9	17.8	1.2
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	4.0	0.54	4.2	0.49	4.1	0.51
Multithreading Test	27.4	0.31	22.7	3.6	25.0	1.9
All Tests	16.1	0.34	11.4	1.6	13.7	0.98

The results above show that in general Hibernate with H2 embedded is much more efficient than EclipseLink with MySQL server in deleting JPA entity objects from the database. Comparing the normalized speed of EclipseLink with MySQL database server (0.98) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 embedded database (13.7) reveals that in these tests, Hibernate with H2 embedded is 14.0 times faster than EclipseLink with MySQL server.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using multithreading with small transaction size. Comparing the normalized speed of EclipseLink with MySQL database server (0.31) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 embedded database (27.4) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with H2 embedded is 88.4 times faster than EclipseLink with MySQL server.

Comparison of JPA/Database speed - the averages (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction/Retrieval Size	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	Hibernate H2 embedded	EclipseLink MySQL server	Hibernate H2 embedded	EclipseLink MySQL server	Hibernate H2 embedded	EclipseLink MySQL server
Basic Person Test	14.2	1.3	8.3	4.2	11.2	2.7
Element Collection Test	7.2	0.69	4.4	0.89	5.8	0.79
Inheritance Test	12.2	1.1	9.9	4.8	11.0	2.9
Indexing Test	16.1	1.4	12.8	4.9	14.5	3.2
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	7.0	0.85	7.7	0.73	7.3	0.79
Multithreading Test	19.6	2.0	10.9	4.0	15.2	3.0
All Tests	12.9	1.2	9.0	3.3	11.0	2.3

The results above show that in general Hibernate with H2 embedded is much more efficient than EclipseLink with MySQL server in performing JPA database operations. Comparing the normalized speed of EclipseLink with MySQL database server (2.3) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 embedded database (11.0) reveals that in these tests, Hibernate with H2 embedded is 4.8 times faster than EclipseLink with MySQL server.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using database indexes with small transaction/retrieval size. Comparing the normalized speed of EclipseLink with MySQL database server (1.4) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 embedded database (16.1) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with H2 embedded is 11.5 times faster than EclipseLink with MySQL server.

JPA Performance Benchmark (JPAB)