• Benchmark
• Results
• Comparison

JPA Performance Benchmark (JPAB)

Comparison of DataNucleus with DB4O embedded vs Hibernate with H2 server

Each of the following tables focuses on a specific database operation, where the last table presents average results comparison.

Speed comparison of JPA database persistence operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	DataNucleus DB4O embedded	Hibernate H2 server	DataNucleus DB4O embedded	Hibernate H2 server	DataNucleus DB4O embedded	Hibernate H2 server
Basic Person Test	0.059	4.6	1.3	3.0	0.69	3.8
Element Collection Test	0.045	3.7	1.0	1.1	0.52	2.4
Inheritance Test	0.051	6.7	0.85	3.1	0.45	4.9
Indexing Test	0.080	8.2	2.3	4.2	1.2	6.2
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	failed	3.4	failed	3.9	failed	3.7
Multithreading Test	failed	6.8	failed	5.0	failed	5.9
All Tests	0.059	5.6	1.4	3.4	0.71	4.5

DataNucleus with DB4O embedded has failed in 4 tests (see exceptions).

The results above show that in general Hibernate with H2 server is much more efficient than DataNucleus with DB4O embedded in persisting JPA entity objects to the database. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with DB4O embedded database (0.71) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 database server (4.5) reveals that in these tests, Hibernate with H2 server is 6.3 times faster than DataNucleus with DB4O embedded.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using class inheritance in the object model with small transaction size. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with DB4O embedded database (0.051) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 database server (6.7) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with H2 server is 131 times faster than DataNucleus with DB4O embedded.

Speed comparison of JPA database retrieval operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Retrieval Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	DataNucleus DB4O embedded	Hibernate H2 server	DataNucleus DB4O embedded	Hibernate H2 server	DataNucleus DB4O embedded	Hibernate H2 server
Basic Person Test	0.0047	3.1	1.8	6.0	0.90	4.6
Element Collection Test	0.0038	1.0	1.5	1.1	0.77	1.0
Inheritance Test	0.0035	2.9	2.2	7.6	1.1	5.2
Indexing Test	0.0043	2.6	1.8	7.0	0.89	4.8
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	failed	0.42	failed	1.1	failed	0.78
Multithreading Test	failed	6.5	failed	10.5	failed	8.5
All Tests	0.0041	2.8	1.8	5.6	0.91	4.2

DataNucleus with DB4O embedded has failed in 4 tests (see exceptions).

The results above show that in general Hibernate with H2 server is much more efficient than DataNucleus with DB4O embedded in retrieving JPA entity objects from the database. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with DB4O embedded database (0.91) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 database server (4.2) reveals that in these tests, Hibernate with H2 server is 4.6 times faster than DataNucleus with DB4O embedded.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using class inheritance in the object model with small retrieval size. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with DB4O embedded database (0.0035) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 database server (2.9) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with H2 server is 829 times faster than DataNucleus with DB4O embedded.

Speed comparison of JPA database query operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Retrieval Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	DataNucleus DB4O embedded	Hibernate H2 server	DataNucleus DB4O embedded	Hibernate H2 server	DataNucleus DB4O embedded	Hibernate H2 server
Basic Person Test	failed	3.7	failed	1.0	failed	2.3
Element Collection Test	failed	3.7	failed	0.63	failed	2.2
Inheritance Test	failed	3.2	failed	1.4	failed	2.3
Indexing Test	failed	1.7	failed	5.8	failed	3.8
Multithreading Test	failed	1.1	failed	0.88	failed	1.0
All Tests	failed	2.7	failed	1.9	failed	2.3

DataNucleus with DB4O embedded has failed in 10 tests (see exceptions).

Speed comparison of JPA database update operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	DataNucleus DB4O embedded	Hibernate H2 server	DataNucleus DB4O embedded	Hibernate H2 server	DataNucleus DB4O embedded	Hibernate H2 server
Basic Person Test	0.012	2.9	0.76	1.8	0.39	2.4
Element Collection Test	0.012	2.6	1.1	1.1	0.53	1.9
Inheritance Test	0.011	3.2	0.81	2.5	0.41	2.9
Indexing Test	0.011	2.9	1.3	2.7	0.64	2.8
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	failed	1.2	failed	0.43	failed	0.79
Multithreading Test	failed	5.6	failed	2.4	failed	4.0
All Tests	0.012	3.1	0.97	1.8	0.49	2.5

DataNucleus with DB4O embedded has failed in 4 tests (see exceptions).

The results above show that in general Hibernate with H2 server is much more efficient than DataNucleus with DB4O embedded in updating JPA entity objects in the database. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with DB4O embedded database (0.49) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 database server (2.5) reveals that in these tests, Hibernate with H2 server is 5.1 times faster than DataNucleus with DB4O embedded.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using class inheritance in the object model with small transaction size. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with DB4O embedded database (0.011) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 database server (3.2) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with H2 server is 291 times faster than DataNucleus with DB4O embedded.

Speed comparison of JPA database removal operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	DataNucleus DB4O embedded	Hibernate H2 server	DataNucleus DB4O embedded	Hibernate H2 server	DataNucleus DB4O embedded	Hibernate H2 server
Basic Person Test	0.011	3.8	1.5	2.4	0.74	3.1
Element Collection Test	0.010	1.9	1.6	1.1	0.80	1.5
Inheritance Test	0.0093	3.7	1.1	2.5	0.57	3.1
Indexing Test	0.017	7.6	2.1	3.1	1.1	5.3
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	failed	0.99	failed	0.91	failed	0.95
Multithreading Test	failed	6.1	failed	7.3	failed	6.7
All Tests	0.012	4.0	1.6	2.9	0.79	3.5

DataNucleus with DB4O embedded has failed in 4 tests (see exceptions).

The results above show that in general Hibernate with H2 server is much more efficient than DataNucleus with DB4O embedded in deleting JPA entity objects from the database. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with DB4O embedded database (0.79) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 database server (3.5) reveals that in these tests, Hibernate with H2 server is 4.4 times faster than DataNucleus with DB4O embedded.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using database indexes with small transaction size. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with DB4O embedded database (0.017) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 database server (7.6) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with H2 server is 447 times faster than DataNucleus with DB4O embedded.

Comparison of JPA/Database speed - the averages (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction/Retrieval Size	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	DataNucleus DB4O embedded	Hibernate H2 server	DataNucleus DB4O embedded	Hibernate H2 server	DataNucleus DB4O embedded	Hibernate H2 server
Basic Person Test	0.022	3.6	1.3	2.8	0.68	3.2
Element Collection Test	0.018	2.6	1.3	1.0	0.66	1.8
Inheritance Test	0.019	4.0	1.2	3.4	0.63	3.7
Indexing Test	0.028	4.6	1.9	4.5	0.94	4.6
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	failed	1.5	failed	1.6	failed	1.6
Multithreading Test	failed	5.2	failed	5.2	failed	5.2
All Tests	0.022	3.7	1.4	3.2	0.73	3.4

The results above show that in general Hibernate with H2 server is much more efficient than DataNucleus with DB4O embedded in performing JPA database operations. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with DB4O embedded database (0.73) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 database server (3.4) reveals that in these tests, Hibernate with H2 server is 4.7 times faster than DataNucleus with DB4O embedded.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using class inheritance in the object model with small transaction/retrieval size. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with DB4O embedded database (0.019) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with H2 database server (4.0) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with H2 server is 211 times faster than DataNucleus with DB4O embedded.

Other Head to Head DBMS/JPA Comparisons

JPA Performance Benchmark - Copyright © 2010, 2011, 2012 ObjectDB Software Ltd. - All rights reserved.
The benchmark program is released as open source under the GPL license.