• Benchmark
• Results
• Comparison

JPA Performance Benchmark (JPAB)

Comparison of Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded vs DataNucleus with Derby embedded

Each of the following tables focuses on a specific database operation, where the last table presents average results comparison.

Speed comparison of JPA database persistence operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	Hibernate HSQLDB embedded	DataNucleus Derby embedded	Hibernate HSQLDB embedded	DataNucleus Derby embedded	Hibernate HSQLDB embedded	DataNucleus Derby embedded
Basic Person Test	32.6	4.6	13.1	2.8	22.9	3.7
Element Collection Test	15.1	2.4	8.2	1.6	11.7	2.0
Inheritance Test	25.5	4.6	13.6	2.7	19.5	3.7
Indexing Test	29.6	7.6	18.8	4.8	24.2	6.2
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	13.8	1.6	15.6	1.4	14.7	1.5
Multithreading Test	37.4	8.6	13.0	3.3	25.2	5.9
All Tests	25.6	4.9	13.7	2.8	19.7	3.8

The results above show that in general Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is much more efficient than DataNucleus with Derby embedded in persisting JPA entity objects to the database. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with Derby embedded database (3.8) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded database (19.7) reveals that in these tests, Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is 5.2 times faster than DataNucleus with Derby embedded.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using graphs of objects with large transaction size. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with Derby embedded database (1.4) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded database (15.6) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is 11.1 times faster than DataNucleus with Derby embedded.

Speed comparison of JPA database retrieval operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Retrieval Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	Hibernate HSQLDB embedded	DataNucleus Derby embedded	Hibernate HSQLDB embedded	DataNucleus Derby embedded	Hibernate HSQLDB embedded	DataNucleus Derby embedded
Basic Person Test	24.8	6.8	16.4	14.9	20.6	10.9
Element Collection Test	11.3	5.4	10.8	7.6	11.0	6.5
Inheritance Test	21.7	8.8	21.0	14.8	21.3	11.8
Indexing Test	11.9	9.2	21.5	14.1	16.7	11.6
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	3.6	9.9	4.7	15.8	4.1	12.9
Multithreading Test	19.8	11.9	21.5	11.5	20.6	11.7
All Tests	15.5	8.7	16.0	13.1	15.7	10.9

The results above show that in general Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is more efficient than DataNucleus with Derby embedded in retrieving JPA entity objects from the database.

A large performance gap has been detected when using simple basic entities with small retrieval size. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with Derby embedded database (6.8) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded database (24.8) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is 3.6 times faster than DataNucleus with Derby embedded.

On the other hand, Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is slower, for instance, when using graphs of objects with large retrieval size. Comparing the normalized speed of Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded database (4.7) to the normalized speed of DataNucleus with Derby embedded database (15.8) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is 3.4 times slower than DataNucleus with Derby embedded.

Speed comparison of JPA database query operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Retrieval Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	Hibernate HSQLDB embedded	DataNucleus Derby embedded	Hibernate HSQLDB embedded	DataNucleus Derby embedded	Hibernate HSQLDB embedded	DataNucleus Derby embedded
Basic Person Test	3.6	39.1	0.88	7.5	2.2	23.3
Element Collection Test	3.4	46.0	1.7	6.7	2.6	26.3
Inheritance Test	2.9	7.7	1.0	3.8	1.9	5.7
Indexing Test	9.9	0.053	21.7	8.0	15.8	4.0
Multithreading Test	1.1	failed	0.58	failed	0.82	failed
All Tests	4.2	23.2	5.2	6.5	4.7	14.8

DataNucleus with Derby embedded has failed in 2 tests (see exceptions).

The results above show that in general DataNucleus with Derby embedded is much more efficient than Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded in executing the tested JPA queries. Comparing the normalized speed of Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded database (4.7) to the normalized speed of DataNucleus with Derby embedded database (14.8) reveals that in these tests, DataNucleus with Derby embedded is 3.1 times faster than Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using JPA element collections with small retrieval size. Comparing the normalized speed of Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded database (3.4) to the normalized speed of DataNucleus with Derby embedded database (46.0) reveals that in that case, DataNucleus with Derby embedded is 13.5 times faster than Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded.

On the other hand, DataNucleus with Derby embedded is slower, for instance, when using database indexes with small retrieval size. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with Derby embedded database (0.053) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded database (9.9) reveals that in that case, DataNucleus with Derby embedded is 187 times slower than Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded.

Speed comparison of JPA database update operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	Hibernate HSQLDB embedded	DataNucleus Derby embedded	Hibernate HSQLDB embedded	DataNucleus Derby embedded	Hibernate HSQLDB embedded	DataNucleus Derby embedded
Basic Person Test	14.2	4.0	5.0	3.8	9.6	3.9
Element Collection Test	10.1	3.7	5.6	4.5	7.8	4.1
Inheritance Test	13.4	4.4	7.5	4.8	10.5	4.6
Indexing Test	10.7	5.2	6.1	4.2	8.4	4.7
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	3.7	2.7	2.5	1.5	3.1	2.1
Multithreading Test	23.9	failed	3.8	failed	13.9	failed
All Tests	12.7	4.0	5.1	3.7	8.9	3.9

DataNucleus with Derby embedded has failed in 2 tests (see exceptions).

The results above show that in general Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is more efficient than DataNucleus with Derby embedded in updating JPA entity objects in the database. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with Derby embedded database (3.9) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded database (8.9) reveals that in these tests, Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is 2.3 times faster than DataNucleus with Derby embedded.

A large performance gap has been detected when using simple basic entities with small transaction size. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with Derby embedded database (4.0) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded database (14.2) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is 3.6 times faster than DataNucleus with Derby embedded.

Speed comparison of JPA database removal operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	Hibernate HSQLDB embedded	DataNucleus Derby embedded	Hibernate HSQLDB embedded	DataNucleus Derby embedded	Hibernate HSQLDB embedded	DataNucleus Derby embedded
Basic Person Test	26.1	3.5	17.5	1.3	21.8	2.4
Element Collection Test	9.1	1.9	5.2	1.6	7.1	1.7
Inheritance Test	21.4	2.4	17.7	1.3	19.6	1.9
Indexing Test	33.0	6.6	16.3	1.9	24.7	4.3
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	5.4	0.81	8.2	0.93	6.8	0.87
Multithreading Test	38.5	failed	28.6	failed	33.5	failed
All Tests	22.3	3.0	15.6	1.4	18.9	2.2

DataNucleus with Derby embedded has failed in 2 tests (see exceptions).

The results above show that in general Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is much more efficient than DataNucleus with Derby embedded in deleting JPA entity objects from the database. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with Derby embedded database (2.2) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded database (18.9) reveals that in these tests, Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is 8.6 times faster than DataNucleus with Derby embedded.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using class inheritance in the object model with large transaction size. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with Derby embedded database (1.3) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded database (17.7) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is 13.6 times faster than DataNucleus with Derby embedded.

Comparison of database storage efficiency (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	Hibernate HSQLDB embedded	DataNucleus Derby embedded	Hibernate HSQLDB embedded	DataNucleus Derby embedded	Hibernate HSQLDB embedded	DataNucleus Derby embedded
Basic Person Test	41.4	53.3	41.4	53.3	41.4	53.3
Element Collection Test	46.9	42.6	46.9	42.6	46.9	42.6
Inheritance Test	41.4	48.1	41.4	48.1	41.4	48.1
Indexing Test	48.4	62.3	49.2	63.3	48.8	62.8
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	28.5	13.6	21.4	10.2	25.0	11.9
Multithreading Test	51.9	52.0	10.3	8.0	31.1	30.0
All Tests	43.1	45.3	35.1	37.6	39.1	41.5

The results above show that in general DataNucleus with Derby embedded is slightly more efficient than Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded in using disk space.

On the other hand, DataNucleus with Derby embedded is slower, for instance, when using graphs of objects with large transaction size. Comparing the normalized score of DataNucleus with Derby embedded database (10.2) to the normalized score of Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded database (21.4) reveals that in that case, DataNucleus with Derby embedded is 2.1 times less efficient than Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded.

Comparison of JPA/Database speed - the averages (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction/Retrieval Size	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	Hibernate HSQLDB embedded	DataNucleus Derby embedded	Hibernate HSQLDB embedded	DataNucleus Derby embedded	Hibernate HSQLDB embedded	DataNucleus Derby embedded
Basic Person Test	20.2	11.6	10.6	6.1	15.4	8.8
Element Collection Test	9.8	11.9	6.3	4.4	8.0	8.1
Inheritance Test	17.0	5.6	12.2	5.5	14.6	5.5
Indexing Test	19.0	5.7	16.9	6.6	18.0	6.2
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	6.6	3.7	7.8	4.9	7.2	4.3
Multithreading Test	24.1	10.3	13.5	7.4	18.8	8.8
All Tests	16.5	8.0	11.3	5.7	13.9	6.9

The results above show that in general Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is more efficient than DataNucleus with Derby embedded in performing JPA database operations. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with Derby embedded database (6.9) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded database (13.9) reveals that in these tests, Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is 2.0 times faster than DataNucleus with Derby embedded.

A large performance gap has been detected when using database indexes with small transaction/retrieval size. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with Derby embedded database (5.7) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded database (19.0) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with HSQLDB embedded is 3.3 times faster than DataNucleus with Derby embedded.

Other Head to Head DBMS/JPA Comparisons

JPA Performance Benchmark - Copyright © 2010, 2011, 2012 ObjectDB Software Ltd. - All rights reserved.
The benchmark program is released as open source under the GPL license.