Comparison of Hibernate with Derby embedded vs DataNucleus with SQLite embedded

Each of the following tables focuses on a specific database operation, where the last table presents average results comparison.

Speed comparison of JPA database persistence operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	Hibernate Derby embedded	DataNucleus SQLite embedded	Hibernate Derby embedded	DataNucleus SQLite embedded	Hibernate Derby embedded	DataNucleus SQLite embedded
Basic Person Test	9.3		8.1		8.7
Element Collection Test	6.9		4.5		5.7
Inheritance Test	4.7		6.9		5.8
Indexing Test	7.6		9.7		8.6
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	3.3		4.4		3.9
Multithreading Test	9.8		0.0000		4.9
All Tests	6.9		5.6		6.3

Speed comparison of JPA database retrieval operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Retrieval Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	Hibernate Derby embedded	DataNucleus SQLite embedded	Hibernate Derby embedded	DataNucleus SQLite embedded	Hibernate Derby embedded	DataNucleus SQLite embedded
Basic Person Test	11.1	0.43	10.4		10.7	0.43
Element Collection Test	5.5		4.2		4.8
Inheritance Test	5.8		6.2		6.0
Indexing Test	3.8		14.5		9.2
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	1.8		3.7		2.8
Multithreading Test	10.1		14.4		12.3
All Tests	6.4	0.43	8.9		7.6	0.43

The results above show that in general Hibernate with Derby embedded is much more efficient than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded in retrieving JPA entity objects from the database. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with SQLite embedded database (0.43) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with Derby embedded database (7.6) reveals that in these tests, Hibernate with Derby embedded is 17.7 times faster than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using simple basic entities with small retrieval size. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with SQLite embedded database (0.43) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with Derby embedded database (11.1) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with Derby embedded is 25.8 times faster than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded.

Speed comparison of JPA database query operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Retrieval Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	Hibernate Derby embedded	DataNucleus SQLite embedded	Hibernate Derby embedded	DataNucleus SQLite embedded	Hibernate Derby embedded	DataNucleus SQLite embedded
Basic Person Test	1.9	failed	3.7		2.8	failed
Element Collection Test	3.6		4.1		3.9
Inheritance Test	0.70		3.1		1.9
Indexing Test	9.1		9.3		9.2
Multithreading Test	4.5		7.0		5.8
All Tests	4.0	failed	5.4		4.7	failed

DataNucleus with SQLite embedded has failed in 1 tests (see exceptions).

Speed comparison of JPA database update operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	Hibernate Derby embedded	DataNucleus SQLite embedded	Hibernate Derby embedded	DataNucleus SQLite embedded	Hibernate Derby embedded	DataNucleus SQLite embedded
Basic Person Test	2.1	0.025	2.4		2.3	0.025
Element Collection Test	4.2		1.7		2.9
Inheritance Test	2.1		2.7		2.4
Indexing Test	6.5		3.9		5.2
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	2.5		1.8		2.2
Multithreading Test	2.7		1.5		2.1
All Tests	3.3	0.025	2.3		2.8	0.025

The results above show that in general Hibernate with Derby embedded is much more efficient than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded in updating JPA entity objects in the database. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with SQLite embedded database (0.025) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with Derby embedded database (2.8) reveals that in these tests, Hibernate with Derby embedded is 112 times faster than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using simple basic entities with small transaction size. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with SQLite embedded database (0.025) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with Derby embedded database (2.1) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with Derby embedded is 84.0 times faster than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded.

Speed comparison of JPA database removal operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	Hibernate Derby embedded	DataNucleus SQLite embedded	Hibernate Derby embedded	DataNucleus SQLite embedded	Hibernate Derby embedded	DataNucleus SQLite embedded
Basic Person Test	10.8	0.17	8.9		9.8	0.17
Element Collection Test	7.1		1.2		4.1
Inheritance Test	11.8		6.3		9.0
Indexing Test	22.7		5.6		14.2
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	5.7		9.0		7.3
Multithreading Test	2.2		0.0000		1.1
All Tests	10.0	0.17	5.2		7.6	0.17

The results above show that in general Hibernate with Derby embedded is much more efficient than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded in deleting JPA entity objects from the database. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with SQLite embedded database (0.17) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with Derby embedded database (7.6) reveals that in these tests, Hibernate with Derby embedded is 44.7 times faster than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using simple basic entities with small transaction size. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with SQLite embedded database (0.17) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with Derby embedded database (10.8) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with Derby embedded is 63.5 times faster than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded.

Comparison of database storage efficiency (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	Hibernate Derby embedded	DataNucleus SQLite embedded	Hibernate Derby embedded	DataNucleus SQLite embedded	Hibernate Derby embedded	DataNucleus SQLite embedded
Basic Person Test	13.7		13.7		13.7
Element Collection Test	15.2		15.2		15.2
Inheritance Test	14.7		15.5		15.1
Indexing Test	14.2		14.2		14.2
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	5.3		5.3		5.3
Multithreading Test	11.3		9.9		10.6
All Tests	12.4		12.3		12.3

Comparison of JPA/Database speed - the averages (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction/Retrieval Size	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	Hibernate Derby embedded	DataNucleus SQLite embedded	Hibernate Derby embedded	DataNucleus SQLite embedded	Hibernate Derby embedded	DataNucleus SQLite embedded
Basic Person Test	7.0	0.21	6.7		6.9	0.21
Element Collection Test	5.5		3.1		4.3
Inheritance Test	5.0		5.0		5.0
Indexing Test	10.0		8.6		9.3
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	3.3		4.7		4.0
Multithreading Test	5.9		4.6		5.2
All Tests	6.2	0.21	5.5		5.8	0.21

The results above show that in general Hibernate with Derby embedded is much more efficient than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded in performing JPA database operations. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with SQLite embedded database (0.21) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with Derby embedded database (5.8) reveals that in these tests, Hibernate with Derby embedded is 27.6 times faster than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using simple basic entities with small transaction/retrieval size. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with SQLite embedded database (0.21) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with Derby embedded database (7.0) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with Derby embedded is 33.3 times faster than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded.

JPA Performance Benchmark (JPAB)