• Benchmark
• Results
• Comparison

JPA Performance Benchmark (JPAB)

Comparison of Hibernate with Derby server vs EclipseLink with SQLite embedded

Each of the following tables focuses on a specific database operation, where the last table presents average results comparison.

Speed comparison of JPA database persistence operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	Hibernate Derby server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	Hibernate Derby server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	Hibernate Derby server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded
Basic Person Test	3.8	0.074	3.0	0.90	3.4	0.49
Element Collection Test	2.0	0.061	1.3	0.65	1.7	0.36
Inheritance Test	3.4	0.083	3.0	0.82	3.2	0.45
Indexing Test	4.8	0.11	4.1	1.6	4.4	0.87
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	1.8	0.24	1.6	0.91	1.7	0.57
Multithreading Test	6.9	0.10	3.9	2.1	5.4	1.1
All Tests	3.8	0.11	2.8	1.2	3.3	0.64

The results above show that in general Hibernate with Derby server is much more efficient than EclipseLink with SQLite embedded in persisting JPA entity objects to the database. Comparing the normalized speed of EclipseLink with SQLite embedded database (0.64) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with Derby database server (3.3) reveals that in these tests, Hibernate with Derby server is 5.2 times faster than EclipseLink with SQLite embedded.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using multithreading with small transaction size. Comparing the normalized speed of EclipseLink with SQLite embedded database (0.10) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with Derby database server (6.9) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with Derby server is 69.0 times faster than EclipseLink with SQLite embedded.

Speed comparison of JPA database retrieval operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Retrieval Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	Hibernate Derby server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	Hibernate Derby server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	Hibernate Derby server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded
Basic Person Test	3.8	failed	8.4	failed	6.1	failed
Element Collection Test	1.0	0.0007	1.0	failed	1.0	0.0007
Inheritance Test	3.5	failed	9.7	failed	6.6	failed
Indexing Test	3.2	failed	9.5	failed	6.4	failed
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	0.91	failed	1.2	failed	1.1	failed
Multithreading Test	7.8	failed	13.4	failed	10.6	failed
All Tests	3.4	0.0007	7.2	failed	5.3	0.0007

EclipseLink with SQLite embedded has failed in 11 tests (see exceptions).

Speed comparison of JPA database query operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Retrieval Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	Hibernate Derby server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	Hibernate Derby server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	Hibernate Derby server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded
Basic Person Test	34.0	1.2	4.1	failed	19.1	1.2
Element Collection Test	33.8	0.29	0.64	failed	17.2	0.29
Inheritance Test	20.5	0.69	5.0	failed	12.8	0.69
Indexing Test	2.0	0.0008	9.2	failed	5.6	0.0008
Multithreading Test	36.2	failed	5.1	failed	20.6	failed
All Tests	25.3	0.55	4.8	failed	15.1	0.55

EclipseLink with SQLite embedded has failed in 6 tests (see exceptions).

Speed comparison of JPA database update operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	Hibernate Derby server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	Hibernate Derby server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	Hibernate Derby server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded
Basic Person Test	2.9	failed	2.5	failed	2.7	failed
Element Collection Test	2.3	0.0016	1.5	failed	1.9	0.0016
Inheritance Test	2.9	failed	3.5	failed	3.2	failed
Indexing Test	3.0	failed	4.2	failed	3.6	failed
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	1.2	failed	0.58	failed	0.91	failed
Multithreading Test	6.8	failed	2.5	failed	4.6	failed
All Tests	3.2	0.0016	2.5	failed	2.8	0.0016

EclipseLink with SQLite embedded has failed in 11 tests (see exceptions).

Speed comparison of JPA database removal operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	Hibernate Derby server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	Hibernate Derby server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	Hibernate Derby server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded
Basic Person Test	2.9	failed	3.5	failed	3.2	failed
Element Collection Test	1.7	0.0006	0.87	failed	1.3	0.0006
Inheritance Test	2.9	failed	3.6	failed	3.2	failed
Indexing Test	3.7	failed	3.6	failed	3.7	failed
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	0.69	failed	0.70	failed	0.70	failed
Multithreading Test	6.2	failed	5.1	failed	5.6	failed
All Tests	3.0	0.0006	2.9	failed	3.0	0.0006

EclipseLink with SQLite embedded has failed in 11 tests (see exceptions).

Comparison of JPA/Database speed - the averages (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction/Retrieval Size	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	Hibernate Derby server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	Hibernate Derby server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	Hibernate Derby server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded
Basic Person Test	9.5	0.66	4.3	0.90	6.9	0.74
Element Collection Test	8.2	0.070	1.1	0.65	4.6	0.17
Inheritance Test	6.6	0.38	5.0	0.82	5.8	0.53
Indexing Test	3.3	0.058	6.1	1.6	4.7	0.58
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	1.2	0.24	1.0	0.91	1.1	0.57
Multithreading Test	12.8	0.10	6.0	2.1	9.4	1.1
All Tests	7.1	0.22	4.0	1.2	5.6	0.52

The results above show that in general Hibernate with Derby server is much more efficient than EclipseLink with SQLite embedded in performing JPA database operations. Comparing the normalized speed of EclipseLink with SQLite embedded database (0.52) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with Derby database server (5.6) reveals that in these tests, Hibernate with Derby server is 10.8 times faster than EclipseLink with SQLite embedded.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using multithreading with small transaction/retrieval size. Comparing the normalized speed of EclipseLink with SQLite embedded database (0.10) to the normalized speed of Hibernate with Derby database server (12.8) reveals that in that case, Hibernate with Derby server is 128 times faster than EclipseLink with SQLite embedded.

Other Head to Head DBMS/JPA Comparisons

JPA Performance Benchmark - Copyright © 2010, 2011, 2012 ObjectDB Software Ltd. - All rights reserved.
The benchmark program is released as open source under the GPL license.